Sustainable landscape development and value rigidity: the Pirsig‘s monkey trap

  • Giovanni Zurlini Landscape Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technology, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-5294
  • Irene Petrosillo Landscape Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technology, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7359-4095
  • András Bozsik University of Debrecen, Department of Plant Protection, Debrecen, Hungary
  • Jon Cloud Cloud Holding Inc., 342 Indian Road Cres Toronto, Canada
  • Roberta Aretano Landscape Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technology, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-8105
  • Noa Kekuewa Lincoln Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in the Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1070-4290
Keywords: Landscape sustainability, Rigidity traps, Societal values, Value rigidity

Abstract

New broader, adaptable and accommodating sets of themes have been proposed to help to identify, understand and solve sustainability problems. However, how this knowledge will foster decisions that lead to more desirable outcomes and analyses necessary to transition to sustainability remains a critical theoretical and empirical question for basic and applied research. We argue that we are still underestimating the tendency to lock into certain patterns that come at the cost of the ability to adjust to new situations. This rigidity limits the ability of persons, groups, and companies to respond to new problems, and can make it hard to learn new facts because we pre-select facts as important, or not, in line with our established values. Changing circumstances demand to reappraise values like in the case of Pirsig's monkey and its rice. There is an urgent need to go beyond such local, static and short-term conceptions, where landscape sustainability has been incorrectly envisioned as a durable, stable condition that, once achieved, could persist for generations. We argue that to manage a global transition toward more environmentally efficient and, therefore, more sustainable land-use we have to reappraise societal values at the root of overregulation and rigidity.

Published
2015-03-16
How to Cite
(1)
Zurlini, G.; Petrosillo, I.; Bozsik, A.; Cloud, J.; Aretano, R.; Lincoln, N. K. Sustainable Landscape Development and Value Rigidity: The Pirsig‘s Monkey Trap. LO 2015, 40, 1-19.
Issue
Section
Research Article