Assessing landscape services as foundation for Green Infrastructure functionality: the case of the Wienerwald Biosphere Reserve.


  • Mita Drius Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, Dept. of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna
  • Katharina Theresa Sams Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, Dept. of Landscape, Spatial and Infrastructure Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Austria
  • Friedrich Knopper Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, Dept. of Landscape, Spatial and Infrastructure Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Austria
  • Christa Hainz-Renetzeder Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, Dept. of Landscape, Spatial and Infrastructure Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Austria
  • Christiane Brandenburg Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, Dept. of Landscape, Spatial and Infrastructure Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Austria
  • Thomas Wrbka Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, Dept. of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Austria



Wienerwald Biosphere Reserve, landscape services, ecosystem services, green infrastructure, capacity matrix


Biosphere Reserves are considered as means for the people who live and work within them to attain a balanced relationship with the natural and semi-natural environment. Moreover, they contribute to the needs of society by showing a way to a more sustainable future. The Wienerwald Biosphere Reserve partly surrounds the city of Vienna and other minor settlements, representing a well-developed example of Green Infrastructure (GI) of great cultural and natural value. Its heterogeneous landscape offers a variety of landscape services (LS).

In this work we quantified and mapped the capacity of LS offered by the open land elements of Wienerwald. Starting from a high-resolution dataset, we selected suitable indicator classes, and scored each ecological and socio-cultural service through an expert-based capacity matrix. The subsequent GIS analyses focused on the intensity and density of LS capacities by developing an index useful for mapping GI functionality.

The work provides an effective monitoring tool for the Reserve’s both ecological and socio-cultural sustainability performance. It also allows detecting resilient areas, by considering both the spatial distribution and the abundance of landscape elements.


Bastian, O. and Schreiber, K.-F. 1999. Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft. 2nd ed. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag Heidelberg, Berlin.

Bastian, O., Grunewald, K., Syrbe, R.U., Walz, U., Wende, W. 2014. Landscape services: the concept and its practical relevance. Landscape Ecology 29(9), 1463-1479. DOI:10.1007/s10980-014-0064-5 DOI:

Baral, H., Keenan, R.J., Fox, J.C., Stork, N.E., Kasel, S. 2013. Spatial assessment of ecosystem goods and services in complex production landscapes: A case study from south-eastern Australia. Ecological Complexity 13, 35–45. DOI:10.1016/j.ecocom.2012.11.001 DOI:

Biosphärenpark Wienerwald Management GmbH, 2019. Lebensregion Biosphärenpark Wienerwald - Zonierung. [Accessed 24 April 2019].

Brenner, H., Drozdowski, I., Mrkvicka, A. 2015. Wälder im Wienerwald. Biosphärenpark Wienerwald Management GmbH.

Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y., Müller, F. 2014. Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape Online 34(1), 1–32. DOI:10.3097/LO.201434 DOI:

Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F., Windhorst, W. 2009. Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services - A concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online 15(1), 1–22. DOI:10.3097/LO.200915 DOI:

Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., Müller, F. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators 21, 17-29. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019 DOI:

Campagne, C.S., Roche, P. 2018. May the matrix be with you! Guidelines for the application of expert-based matrix approach for ecosystem services assessment and mapping. One Ecosystem 3, e24134. DOI:10.3897/oneeco.3.e24134 DOI:

Chapman, P.M. 2012. Adaptive monitoring based on ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment 415, 56–60. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.03.036 DOI:

Cimon-Morin, J., Darveau, M., Poulin, M. 2013. Fostering synergies between ecosystem services and biodiversity in conservation planning: a review. Biological Conservation 166, 144–154. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.023 DOI:

Clerici, N., Paracchini, M.-L., Maes, J. 2014. Land-cover change dynamics and insights into ecosystem services in European stream riparian zones. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 14(2), 107-120. DOI:10.1016/j.ecohyd.2014.01.002 DOI:

Crossman, N.D., Burkhard, B., Nedkov, S., Willemen, L., Petz, K., Palomo, I., Drakou, E.G., Martín-Lopez, B., McPhearson, T., Boyanova, K., Alkemade, R., Egoh, B., Dunbar, M.B., Maes, J. 2013. A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 4, 4-14. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001. DOI:

Daily, G.C. 1997. Nature’s services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DC.

de Groot, R., Wilson, M., Boumans, R. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41, 1-20. DOI:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7 DOI:

de Groot, R.S. 2006. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning (75), 175–186. DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016 DOI:

de Groot, R.S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., Willemen, L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7(3), 260–272. DOI:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 DOI:

Drius, M., Sams, K.T., Knopper, F., Brandenburg, C., Wrbka, T., 2019. Biosphere Reserve Integrated Monitoring based on Social and Environmental Ecosystem Services – BRIMSEN. Final Report. ISBN-13 Online: 978-3-7001-8617-5. DOI:10.1553/MAB-BRIMSENs1 DOI:

Drozdowski, I., Mrkvicka, A., Pfundner, G. 2018. Wiesen und Weiden im Wienerwald. 5th ed. Biosphärenpark Wienerwald Management GmbH.

Egoh, B., Drakou, E., Dunbar, M., Maes, J., Willemen, L. 2012. Indicators for mapping ecoystem services: a review. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports.

European Commission 2011. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. [Accessed 2 March 2019]

European Commission 2013. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Green Infrastructure (GI) — Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital. COM(2013) 249 final. [Accessed 2 March 2019]

European Commission 2016. Green Infrastructure. [Accessed 2 March 2019]

Geofabrik GmbH, and OpenStreetMap Contributors. 2019. Download OpenStreetMap data for this region: Austria. [Accessed 2 March 2019].

Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem service and human well-being. In: Raffaelli D.G. and Frid C.L. (eds.), Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis, BES Ecological Reviews Series, Cambridge University Press.

Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M. 2018. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. European Environment Agency. DOI:

Hainz-Renetzeder, C., Schneidergruber, A., Kuttner, M., Wrbka, T. 2014. Assessing the potential supply of landscape services to support ecological restoration of degraded landscapes: A case study in the Austrian-Hungarian trans-boundary region of Lake Neusiedl. Ecological Modelling 295, 196–206. DOI:DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.001. DOI:

Hermann, A., Schleifer, S., Wrbka, T. 2011. The Concept of Ecosystem Services Regarding Landscape Research : A Review. Living Reviews in Landscape Reseach 5(1), 1–37. DOI:10.12942/LRLR-2011-1 DOI:

Hermann, A. et al. 2014. Assessment framework for landscape services in European cultural landscapes: An Austrian Hungarian case study. Ecological Indicators 37, 229–240. DOI:DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.019. DOI:

Hou, Y., Burkhard, B., Müller, F. 2013. Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 127, 117–131. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.002. DOI:

Isbell, F., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., Loreau, M. 2015. The biodiversity-dependent ecosystem service debt. Ecology Letters 18(2), 119–134. DOI:10.1111/ele.12393. DOI:

Jacobs, S., Burkhard, B., Van Daele, T., Staes, J., & Schneiders, A. 2015. ‘The Matrix Reloaded’: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling 295, 21-30. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024 DOI:

John, H., Neubert, M., Marrs, C. (eds.) 2019. Green Infrastructure Handbook - Conceptual & Theoretical Background, Terms and Definitions. First output of the Interreg Central Europe Project MaGICLandscapes - Managing Green Infrastructure in Central European Landscapes.

Kandziora, M., Burkhard, B., Müller, F. 2013. Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution. Ecosystem Services 4, 47-59. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001 DOI:

Kaiser, G., Burkhard, B., Römer, H., Sangkaew, S., Graterol, R., Haitook, T., Sterr, H., Sakuna-Schwartz, D. 2013. Mapping tsunami impacts on land cover and related ecosystem service supply in Phang Nga, Thailand. Natural Hazards And Earth System Sciences 13(12), 3095-3111. DOI:10.5194/nhess-13-3095-2013 DOI:

Konkoly-Gyuró, É. 2011. Definition of landscape services. In Wrbka T. et al. (ed) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services as Scientific Foundation for the Sustainable Implementation of the Redesigned Biosphere Reserve ‘Neusiedler See’. Biological Sciences. DOI:10.1553/bioserv-neusiedler-sees.

Kopperoinen, L., Itkonen, P., Niemelä, J. 2014. Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology. Landscape Ecology 29(8), 1361-1375. DOI:10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2 DOI:

Kukkala, A.S., Moilanen, A. 2017. Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization. Landscape Ecology 32, 5-14. DOI:10.1007/s10980-016-0446-y DOI:

Levrel, H., Bouamrane, M. 2008. Instrumental Learning and Sustainability Indicators: Outputs from Co-Construction Experiments in West African Biosphere Reserves. Ecology and Society 13(1). DOI:10.5751/ES-02218-130128 DOI:

Liquete, C., Kleeschulte, S., Dige, G., Maes, J., Grizzetti, B., Olah, B., Zulian, G. 2015. Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: A Pan-European case study. Environmental Science and Policy 54, 268-280. DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.009. DOI:

Lotze-Campen, H., Reusswig, F., Stoll-Kleemann, S. 2008. Socio-Ecological Monitoring of Biodiversity Change. Building upon the World Network of Biosphere Reserves. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives on Science and Society 17(1), 107–115. DOI:10.14512/gaia.17.S1.8 DOI:

Martínez-Harms, M.J., Balvanera, P. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management 8(1-2), 17-25. DOI:10.1080/21513732.2012.663792. DOI:

Mazza, L., Bennett, G., De Nocker, L., Gantioler, S., Losarcos, L., Margerison, C., Kaphengst, T., McConville, A., Rayment, M., ten Brink, P., Tucker, G., van Diggelen, R. 2011. Green Infrastructure Implementation and Efficiency. Final report for the European Commission, DG Environment on Contract ENV.B.2/SER/2010/0059. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels and London.

MEA 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC.

OpenStreetMap Austria. 2019. Mitmachen – Mapper werden. [Accessed 6 March, 2019].

van Oudenhoven, A.P., Petz, K., Alkemade, R., de Groot, R.S., Hein, L. 2012. Indicators for assessing effects of management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 21, 110–122. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.012 DOI:

Pakzad, P., Osmond, P. 2016. Developing a sustainability indicator set for measuring green infrastructure performance. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences 216, 68-79. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.009 DOI:

Purvis, B., Mao, Y., Robinson, D. 2018. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science. DOI:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5 DOI:

Qureshi, S., Kazmi, S.J.H., Breuste, J.H. 2010. Ecological disturbances due to high cutback in the green infrastructure of Karachi: Analyses of public perception about associated health problems. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 9(3), 187-198. DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.08.003 DOI:

Reimoser, F., Lexer, W., Brandenburg, C., Zink, R., Heckl, F., Bartel, A., Ferner B., Muhar, A. 2008. Integrated Sustainable Wildlife Management in the Biosphere Reserve Wienerwald (Integriertes nachhaltiges Wildtiermanagement im Biosphärenpark Wienerwald). Final Report DOI:10.1553/ISWIMAB DOI:

Reimoser, F., Lexer, W., Brandenburg, C., Ziener, K., Schreiber, B., Bartel, A., Tomek, H., Heckl, F., Hirnschall, F., Kasper, A. 2012. IESP – Towards Integrated Ecological Spatial Planning for the Wienerwald Biosphere Reserve (Grundlagen für eine integrierte ökologisch- räumliche Planung im Biosphärenpark Wienerwald. Nachhaltiges Wildtiermanagement und Freizeitaktivitäten). Final Report. DOI:10.1553/IESP-WIENERWALD DOI:

Termorshuizen, J.W., Opdam, P. 2009. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology 24, 1037–1052. DOI:10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8 DOI:

UNESCO 1996. Biosphere Reserves: The Seville Strategy and the Statutory Framework of the World Network. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO 2002. Biosphere reserves: Special places for people and nature. Paris: UNESCO.

Scolozzi, R., Morri, E., Santolini, R. 2012. Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes. Ecological Indicators 21, 134-144. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.019 DOI:

Slätmo, E., Nilsson, K., Turunen, E. 2019. Implementing green infrastructure in spatial planning in Europe. Land 8(4), 62. DOI:10.3390/land8040062 DOI:

Staudinger, M., Grass, V., Wrbka, T., Mair, B., Rötzer, H. 2014. Bericht Methodik der Projekte Offenlanderhebung Biosphärenpark Wienerwald 2011, Teil 1 und Offenlanderhebung Biosphärenpark Wienerwald 2012-2013, Teil 2. Wien.

Stoll, S. Frenzel, M., Burkhard, B., Adamescu, M., Augustaitis, A., Baeßler, C., Bonet, F.J., Carranza, M.L., Cazacu, C., Cosor, G.L., Díaz-Delgado, R., Grandin, U., Haase, P., Hämäläinen, H., Loke, R., Müller, J., Stanisci, A., Staszewski, T., Müller, F., 2015. Assessment of ecosystem integrity and service gradients across Europe using the LTER Europe network. Ecological Modelling 295, 75–87. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.06.019. DOI:

Vihervaara, P., Kumpula, T., Ruokolainen, A., Tanskanen, A., Burkhard, B. 2012. Using detailed biotope data for Ecosystem service assessment in Natural protection areas. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management 8(1–2), 169–185. DOI:10.1080/21513732.2012.686120 DOI:

Vihervaara, P., Kumpula, T., Tanskanen, A., and Burkhard, B. 2010. Ecosystem services – A tool for sustainable management of human–environment systems. Case study Finnish Forest Lapland. Ecological Complexity 7(3), 410–420. DOI:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.12.002 DOI:

Wienerwald Tourismus GmbH. 2018. Karte. [Accessed 20 August, 2018].

Willemen, L., Veldkamp, A., Verburg, P.H., Hein, L., Leemans, R. 2012. A multi-scale modelling approach for analysing landscape service dynamics. Journal of Environmental Management 100, 86–95. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.022 DOI:

Wrbka, T., Hainz-Renetzeder, C., Kuttner, M., Hermann, A., Brandenburg, C., Ziener, K., Allex, B., Liebl, U., Czachs, C., Konkoly-Gyuró, É., Tirászi, Á., Balázs, P. Bacsárdi, V. 2012. Man and Biosphere - Biodiversity and Ecosystem services as scientific foundation for the sustainable implementation of the Redesigned Biosphere Reserve “Neusiedler See” Final Report. DOI:10.1553/bioserv‐neusiedler‐see.





How to Cite

Drius, M., Sams, K. T., Knopper, F., Hainz-Renetzeder, C., Brandenburg, C., & Wrbka, T. (2020). Assessing landscape services as foundation for Green Infrastructure functionality: the case of the Wienerwald Biosphere Reserve. Landscape Online, 84.